
HI6006 Competitive Strategy Editing Service
Delivery in day(s): 4
Business intelligence (BI) is referred to as combination of processes, technologies and architectures that transform raw data into useful information that commutes beneficial business strategy action. The purpose of this report is to describe the business case regarding implementation of BI in a manufacturing organization for its web-platform (WP) project. In the beginning, the report addresses the issue that can be resolved by implementing the BI. Then it mention about the anticipated outcomes that is associated with the issue along with proper recommendation and justification. After that, it outlines the team for business case analysis by mentioning the responsibilities of the team member. Next, it defines the problem followed by the problem statement. Further, the report discusses about the impact of BI implementation on the organization, followed by the feasibility summary. Finally, the report provides a project overview and project description that includes project objectives, project performance, project assumptions, project constraints, major milestones, cost benefit analysis.
XYZ manufacturer has shifted its business model to a de-centralized one due to its growing customer base for the past 3 years. It is difficult to administering workforce due to provision of continuous support to growing clients in more locations. With the expansion of the workforce the existing legacy mainframe systems maintain internal requirements such as resource management, payroll activities and reporting has become incompetent to efficiently manage these activities (Rodriguez et al., 2013). For the past 10 months this incompetency has resulted in higher costs and increased employee turnover. The company has decided to shift to web-based application which has been outlined in the business case for the WP project, to efficiently manage the company’s administration. In this way, the company will be able to manage its administration from one common and central platform.
By moving its administrative platform to a centralized web-based one, XYZ manufacturer will be able to manage its administrative activities and functions along with employee payroll systems in a consolidated and consistent way. This technological migration will decrease the overhead costs that is associated with the huge workforce in order to manage these tasks. The de-centralized employees will have the freedom to manage their training, payroll, reporting and other administrative tasks. In addition, the company will have benefit from systematic and timely reporting from the regional manager’s provision of continuous update of theirfinancial accounting. As a result, errors will be reduced and cycle time gets improved (Ghazawneh & Henfridsson, 2013).
Different alternatives and options were examined to identify the best possible way to leverage the technology for business process improvement and minimizing the overhead cost in XYZ manufacturers. The suggested WP project will allow the data and functions of the company’s existing mainframe system to periodically migrate to the new web-based platform so as to maintain data integrity and also provides sufficient time for training managers and employees on their roles and responsibilities to respective administrative functions. Besides providing compatibility with other recent information technology (IT) systems, the web-based platform will also improve the reporting efficiency throughout the company. This technology will achieve its desired result in the following manner
The shifting of payroll along with other administrative functions from the legacy mainframe system to the web-based platform will enable the company to manage its resources and business processes. Though current situation and other alternatives were analysed, still the WP project was chosen for this business case proposal as it provides best circumstances to quickly apprehend the benefits while improving efficiency and cost reduction. The other alternatives and options were too tough to define as well as presumed more risk and less benefit. Hence those alternatives cannot properly meet the company’s current objectives.
A business case is actually a business need that defines a problem of the organization, measures the project’s effect that solves the problem and clarifies the proposed plan’s benefits and costs (Kerzner & Kerzner, 2017). The business case analysis team consists of the following individuals and they are responsible for the development and analysis of the WP project business case.
Role | Description | Name / Title |
Executive sponsor | Provide execute support for the project. | Ricky Smith, Vice President (Operations) |
Technology support | Provides all required technological support for the project. | Thomas Williams, Vice President (IT) |
Software support | Provides all required software support for the project. | Albert Philip, Team Lead (Software) |
Process improvement | Advocates team on the techniques of process improvement. | Shane Thompson, Team Lead (Process) |
Project management | Manages the overall business case along with project team. | Steve Jones, Project Manager |
Manager’s burden of addressing employee relation concerns including reporting with balancing the requirements of daily billable task (Alias et al., 2014).
The implementation of WP project will have an impact on the XYZ manufacturer, its tools, processes as well as roles and responsibilities (Whitney & Daniels, 2013).
Initial estimates for the WP Project are:
The WP project overview gives detail about how the project will address the XYZ manufacturer (Heagney, 2016). The overview consists of the following components.
The WP project will perform analysis and reviewal of various potential projects to replace the XYZ manufacturer’s legacy payroll and administration mainframe system with a web-based platform. This will be performed by product identification and selection that will satisfactorily replace the company’s existing system. After selection, the new system will be implemented and once it is operational the old system will be archived (Marchewka, 2014).
The established corporate objectives along with goals of XYZ manufacturer is supported by the WP project. The goals and objectives are listed in the table below (Turner, 2016).
Business Goal/Objective | Description |
Accurate and timely reporting | The web-based tool will provide accurate and real-time reporting of all payroll and administrative metrics. |
Improvement of staff efficiency | Efficiency will be improved as less payroll and HR staff will be required to manage the above mentioned activities. |
Decrease the employee turnover | More flexibility and freedom will help managers to focus on billable work as well as address employee concerns |
Reduction of overhead costs. | Company overhead will be reduced with the requirement of the fewer staff. |
The process, service or key resources and their expected business results to measure the project performance are listed the table below. These performance measures will be further defined as well as evaluated in project plan (Mir & Pinnington, 2014).
Key Resource/Process/Service | Performance Measure |
Reporting | Reporting disparities (gaps and duplicates) will get reduced by the web-based system and within half year the system will requirereconciliation. |
Entry of timesheet / admin data | The non-billable task of managers is eliminated by enabling employees to directly enter their data |
Maintenance of software and system | The maintenance of the new system will get reduced from monthly once to every six months due to reduction of cost and staff requirements. |
Staff resources | Due to automation of various functions there will be elimination of 10 staff positions in payroll and HR. |
The assumptions below are applicable for WP project. With beginning of the project plan, more assumptions are identified and they will be added accordingly (Leach, 2014).
The constraints below are applicable for WP project. With beginning of the project plan, more constraints are identified and they will be added accordingly (Fleming & Koppelman, 2016).
The identified major project milestones are as follows. With the progress of the project planning the schedule is developed, the milestones and their target completion dates will be adjusted, modified and finalized for establishing the baseline schedule (Larson et al., 2014)
Milestones/Deliverables | Target Date |
Project Charter | 01/04/2018 |
Review and completion of project plan | 03/04/2018 |
Project begins | 03/12/2018 |
Completion of first phase | 04/12/2018 |
Completion of second phase | 06/12/2018 |
Completion of third phase | 08/12/2018 |
Completion of fourth phase | 10/12/2018 |
Completion of fifth phase | 12/12/2018 |
Project ends | 12/31/2018 |
After the project gets approved and progress further, each of the above components of the project overview will be extended to more detail level for the working of the project plan.
The actions of cost and savings associated with the WP project, description of those actions, and the costs or savings associated with them are depicted in the table below. The bottom of the table shows the net savings for the project’s first year (David, Dube & Ngulube, 2013).
Action | Action Type | Description | First year costs (- indicates anticipated savings) |
Purchase of the web-based product and licenses | Cost | Primary investment of the WP project | $250,000 |
Training and installation of software | Cost | New software installation cost for IT group and employees training cost for training group | $90,000 |
Reducing 10 HR and payroll staff | Cost | Reduction of an existing overhead is equal to 6 HR staff and 4 payroll staff yearly salary. | -$120,000 |
Managers are relieved from working on administrative and non-billable work. | Savings | The weekly average non-billable time for 16 regional managers is 14. It is expected that this number will be reduced to no more than 2 hours weekly. At an average of $32/hour this results in ($32 x 12 hours /wk reduced non-billable time x 16 managers) $6144 weekly increased revenue. | -$319,488 |
Monthly maintenance of system has been revised to six months. | Savings | Lesser repeated use of IT resources working on added non-value work results about $40,000 | -$40,000 |
Employee turnover reduction upto 10 % | Savings | Cost savings to process out exiting employee and recruit and train new employees is about $48,000 | -$48,000 |
Net First Year Savings | 187,488 |
As per the cost benefit analysis it is found that in the first year XYZ manufacturers will save $187,488 which indicates a remarkable improvement of company’s operating cost and this represent the company’s benefit from this project.
The people’s signatures below implies that the purpose of the business case is clear to them. By sigining below in the document, the authorised signatory has approved the proposed project management. proceed further (Hwang & Ng, 2013).
Approver Name | Title | Signature | Date |
Jones, A. | President and Chief Executive Officer (CEO) | Signature of CEO | Date of signature |
Bond, R. | Executive Vice President (VP) | Signature of VP | Date of signature |
1. Alias, Z., Zawawi, E. M. A., Yusof, K., & Aris, N. M. (2014). Determining critical success factors of project management practice: A conceptual framework. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 153, 61-69.
2. David, R., Dube, A., & Ngulube, P. (2013). A cost-benefit analysis of document management strategies used at a financial institution in Zimbabwe: A case study. South African Journal of Information Management, 15(2), 1-10.
3. Fleming, Q. W., & Koppelman, J. M. (2016, December). Earned value project management. Project Management Institute.
4. Ghazawneh, A., & Henfridsson, O. (2013). Balancing platform control and external contribution in third?party development: the boundary resources model. Information Systems Journal, 23(2), 173-192.
5. Harrison, F., & Lock, D. (2017). Advanced project management: a structured approach. Routledge.
6. Heagney, J. (2016). Fundamentals of project management. Amacom.
7. Hwang, B. G., & Ng, W. J. (2013). Project management knowledge and skills for green construction: Overcoming challenges. International Journal of Project Management, 31(2), 272-284.
8. Kerzner, H., & Kerzner, H. R. (2017). Project management: a systems approach to event planning , scheduling, and controlling. John Wiley & Sons.
9. Larson, E. W., Gray, C. F., Danlin, U., Honig, B., & Bacarini, D. (2014). Project management: The managerial process (Vol. 6). Grandview Heights, OH: McGraw-Hill Education.
10. Leach, L. P. (2014). Critical chain project management. Artech House.
11. archewka, J. T. (2014). Information technology project management. John Wiley & Sons.