COSK2230 Business and Professional Communication Paper Editing Service

COSK2230 Business and Professional Communication Assignment

COSK2230 Business and Professional Communication Paper Editing Service


This report is based on the impact of corporate social activities of organizations on business performance. The major purpose of the report is to investigate how CSR activities influence the business performance. Both large and medium size firms tend to contribute to social development as their responsibility but such activities often act as a significant tool as well to enhance brand image both in domestic andglobal market. Thus, to understand how the implementation of CSR initiatives help brands to enhance business performance and positively reflect on the brand image, this report considers the business operation and CSR initiatives of Woolworths Australia, which is a supermarket chain located across many large cities in Australia. To meet the purpose of the report, this report presents a detailed background and the findings of existing papers. A clear presentation of research techniques used to perform the report has also been discussed. A secondary data analysis has been performed collecting data from annual report, CSR reports, company’s blogs and other reliable secondary resources.

Background to the report

Multiple scholarly papers have investigated corporate social responsibilities and its impact on business performance but their outcome largely vary. Even though the social drawbacks have been debated for decades and just in the recent time they have entered the mainstream management studies as the significant areas of examination. Boulouta and Pitelis (2014) mentioned that social initiatives are the heart of a business as well as social endeavour could be consistent with the business objectives for gaining profits. This should also express the values of serving the society as the soul of the business. A growing phenomena of studies on CSR in the social welfare has demonstrated that some firms have positively responded to the above stated concerns by gathering more resources to CSR. However, the major flaws in the existing studies are such as many inadequately controlled variables, lack of explanations about the particular growth areas caused by CSR. For example, it can be mentioned that CSR can be a proactive business strategy and an effective marketing tool to generate and hold competitive advantages. Therefore, the importance of performing a study on the impact of CSR on business performance lies in the exploration of areas in business that are and can be affected by CSR activities. When investigating the impact, particularly focuses on how CSR activities influence operational performance, financial performance, create platform for gaining competitive advantages and other core areas of Woolworths Group in Australia.

Research Aim

This report aims to examine the impact of Corporate Social Responsibilities on business performance of Woolworths Group in Australia.

Research Questions and Objectives

Research Questions

What are the potential impacts of CSR activities on business performance?

Research Objectives

1. To critically analyse the importance of CSR in business

2. To investigate the impact of CSR on business performance

3. To provide suitable suggestions to plan for CSR to enhance business performance

Literature Review

The relationship between social development and company profitability in present days form significant subjects of academic papers and research on the theme of social responsibility. Tingchi Liu et al., (2014) mentioned that corporate social responsibility describes a business’s obligation to protect and enhance social welfare now and even in the future by creating sustainable benefits for the stakeholders. It is identified that concerning the demonstrated the relation between social responsibility and economic reward, existing studies tend to express varying and simultaneously some contradictory opinions on the subject. Cavaco and Crifo (2014) stated that primary intention of a business is to make money or profits and that only interests matter most when making managerial decisions are those of the shareholders. The author of this article also argues that ethical and optional consideration could be irrelevant, while the decisions that cover these factors could harm business’s financial performance.

On the other side, Bresciani and Ferraris (2016) presented an opposing viewpoint by opining that social issues could be as important as market factors in determining long-run success requiring the same attention and rigorous analysis that have been devoted in the past to the market place. In response to this statement, Rangan, Chase and Karim (2015) argued that socially responsible initiatives could create additional costs that might put business at an economic disadvantage compared to less socially responsible business. Such additional costs might come from the additional activities such as employee welfare programs, community development, plant maintenance and development of environmentally friendly norms and policies. Lee, Herold and Yu (2016) performed a study and mentioned that social responsibility is to be positively related to a business’s stock market performance. However, the possible explanations provided by these scholars for their findings include enhanced relationship with significant stakeholders such as banks, investors as well as the government agencies.

The author of the above mentioned study has also mentioned that a business could benefit from CSR initiatives as its environmentally conscious decisions are often linked to decreased waste leading to limited cost. The example found in this study is a Ford manufacturing factory in Texas was modified to decrease excessive waste-water and this leads to limited municipal charges for pollution and the estimation indicates the initiatives saved the firm from paying millions dollars as penalty. Furthermore, it is worth stating that such enhanced relationship could increase investment in business by the involvement of shareholders, elevate employee morale, increased customer morale, and customer goodwill. Likewise, this enhanced relationship with government agencies that minimize the regulatory cost.

Importance of CSR in business

The term sustainability has become essential in business terminology, with implications much more far reaching compared to friendliness. According to Kolk (2016) savvy leaders understand that to gain a competitive edge, the leaders must have to incorporate sustainable business practices to make sure the long-term success of their organizations. In this context, Taghian, D’Souza and Polonsky (2015) commented that irrespective of the size of business, showing a good corporate relationship could likely to result in significant business benefits. It is identified that a successful corporate social responsibility endeavour or initiatives could enhance business’s reputation by positioning it as a business that inclined to more than just bottom line. Such philosophy can be very attractive, not just to customers or clients but also to merchants, partners and employees.

Relationshipbetween the CSR and employee turnover

Kiliç, Kuzey and Uyar (2015) mentioned that employees are their most valuable asset and that an organization’s capability to retain employees remains as a hallmark of sustainable organizational performance. Indeed, the capability to retain employees indicates that a firm is suitable place where retention of employees has a positive impact for firm’s financial performance and productivity. Rhou, Singal and Koh (2016) mentioned that employee derive justice perception of organizations on the range of fairness shown by the businesses. Studies show that work environments or businesses that are perceived to be fair should have positive influence on organizational outcome, such as in the form of lower employee absenteeism and increasing level of employee commitment.

Empirical evidence on CSR and CFP relationship

A significant issue in corporate governance as well as measurement is the influence of CSR on business’s performance, particularly financial performance. The conventional perspective holds the fact that CSR could be costly as being socially responsible may incur additional cost (Singal, 2014). The instance of socially responsible actions might include investment in pollution control, employee benefits package and sponsorship to the community. The traditional perspective maintains that these expense could deteriorate profitability as well as lead to a ‘competitive advantage”. A contrary perspective is promoted by stakeholder theory, which was first introduced by Freeman in 1984; here the dissatisfaction of any stakeholders group could potentially affect economic rents and destroy the future of the business (Eccles, Ioannou & Serafeim, 2014). Corporate Social Responsibility is therefore a prerequisite for preserving the bottom-line. The author of this article has also mentioned that managers should take account of all individuals and groups with a “stake” in business not just the group of stakeholders. If it is managed appropriately, CSR will enhance the satisfaction of these stakeholders and also lead to enhanced financial performance.

Gaps in the existing literature

Undoubtedly, the existing studies have presented a broad view about the importance and implementation of CSR in business. However, most of the studies are quite vague in terms of the effect of CSR on businesses. The studies lack proper evidences about how CSR is affecting employee turnover or the financial performance of the business. The real-world evidences would have justified the facts presented in the study but they lack in the existing papers. For example, a study performed by Rangan, Chase and Karim (2015) mentions that socially responsible initiatives could generate additional cost that might put business at an economic risk compared to less socially responsible business. However, the author did not provide any supportive evidence to prove this point.

Research Methods

Research methodology or the selection of research techniques determine the outcome of the research. In order to perform the current study, a secondary data analysis has been performed. The following sections present major principle used in the study and the approaches of collecting data for the analysis.

Research Philosophy

Research philosophy is a belief regarding the way in which the data about a phenomenon should be gathered and used (Mackey & Gass, 2015). Research philosophy compromises of three categorizes namely positivism, interpretivism and realism. In the present study, interpretivism research philosophy has been selected, research findings are conventionally judged against the criteria of meaning as well as casual adequacy and contextual sensitivity. Moreover, unlike other research philosophy, positivism research philosophy give importance to an in-depth and intelligible understanding of meaningful context. So, in the present study, impact of CSR cane be examined by a broad and in-depth understanding.

Data Collection Techniques

Data Collection methods compromises of secondary data collection and primary data collection (Lewis, 2015). As the study performs a secondary data analysis, secondary data has been collected. Secondary data has been collected from books, journal articles, sustainability reports of Woolworths Group, Annual report of Woolworths and official blogs of the company.

Data Analysis

The presents study includes the qualitative data analysis method; qualitative data analysis technique is referred to non-numeric information such as interview transcripts, reports, images and text documents (Alvesson & Sköldberg, 2017). However, in the present study, images and notes have been omitted and the analysis is completely based on the text documents and reports. Particularly for performing the analysis, the study uses a framework business analysis method such as charting and interpretation of data.

Research Findings

Secondary data analysis

Theme 1: “Initiatives to a healthy environment”

When it comes to corporate social responsibility, Woolworths plays great role in environmental sustainability as the business recognizes the environmental impact that has across its value chain and work with other suppliers, service providers as well as operation to innovate for a healthy planet. However, Richards et al., (2015) mentioned that the “initiatives toward zero food waste going to landfill”as Woolworths’ sustainability initiative has not been achieved properly. It has been identified that presently a whale of waste stream is still waste food because of the insufficient sorting at the outlet. Nonetheless, in response to its CSR objective, Woolworths, in every year until 2020, is supposed to achieve a year-on-year increase in tonnes of food waste diverted from the landfill. This was supposed to be done through persistently reducing the waste in stock and improving the store management behaviour as well as enhancing the effectiveness of farmer’s program. Devin and Richards (2018) mentioned that when it comes to recyclability of its own brand and packaging for the contribution of circular economy, the organizations should develop more initiatives. This is because Australians are avid recyclers and customers consider it as company’s responsibility to enable them to play their part in preserving the environment by making its packaging recyclable. So, as to improve the strength of the initiative, the business needs to enhance the recyclability of its own brand packaging for the contribution of circular economy. The sustainability report also indicates that Woolworths have reviewed the packaging materials of more than 30000 own brand products and the overall products account for more than 34% of own brand sales as well as required the use of more than 323000 tonnes of packaging materials

Figure 1: Consumption of Packaging in Woolworths supermarket

(Source: 2018)

Theme 2: “A step toward corporate social responsibility”

According to the sustainability of Woolworths Group, the organization tries to value diversity across its operation, from its business perspective, the customers should observe Woolworths’ people a reflection of themselves as well as their communities. In such approach, the business embraces targets which support diversity. According to the annual report, Woolworths employs more than 205,000 people from all walks of life ( 2018) A growing majority is in customer-facing roles. The sustainability report implies that the organization is trying to make sure proportionate representation across several businesses of women and different culture as well as indigenous groups in order to support diversity with the inclusion of culture. The organization aims to recruit and build a team that reflects Australian community and under this initiative, the organization is trying to equip its training managers as well as executives with cultural, unconscious training and gender. Thus, to enhance understanding of diversity, the business should be completing cultural an ethnic mapping of stores, which is considered to be setting the business on a path to reflect the diversity of their community

Figure 2: Waste Minimization rate achieved by Woolworths

(Source: 2018)

Theme 3: “Financial performance and CSR”

According to the first quarter of financial performance, Woolworths has experienced a significant achievement which includes almost 42% of reduction in carbon emission from facilities on the basis of estimated growth levels followed by 25% or above, reduction in carbon emissions per square metre in new supermarkets, while almost 30% reduction in business car fleet emission. Consequently, almost $56.7 billion which is above 3.4% from 2017. Likewise, the net financing cost is around 20.6%, while the gross profit is around 29.5% which is driven primarily by the gross profit enhancement in Australian Food ( 2018)

Figure 3: Financial performance of Woolworth as the result of CSR activities implementation

(Source: 2018)


The above presented dataset also helps to understand that by considering the importance of CSR activities, the organization Woolworths Group significant paid attention to its CSR commitments with the sub-areas of people, planet and propensity. The CSR strategy of the organization indicates that Woolworths tend to develop market centric approaches that are aligned to its CSR initiatives. The organization has hired 197,426 employees with a diverse approach of employment, reported almost 42% in carbon emission from the facilities and the prosperity is around 114 billion. It was also found in the literature that business that has fair policies for all its stakeholders, employees prefer to work in or continue with that organizational setting (Rhou, Singal & Koh, 2016). Nonetheless, the data presentation helps to understand that organization is not able to align its financials goals with the performance of corporate social responsibilities.

The findings also indicate that Woolworths has successfully achieved 91% of the major targets and commitments in their strategy. Nonetheless, it is worth highlighting that in spite of the overall success of the strategy, Woolworth’s commitment to achieve zero food waste to landfill has not been successful. In addition to this, there is another significant fact which needs to be noted that as the strategy timeline is on the verge of completion, the firm is still not properly able to maintain a stable focus on the movement. According to () social issues could be as important as market factors in determining long-run success which deserves same attention and rigorous analysis that have been devoted in the past to the markets. Thus, when it comes to CSR, business should make and give equal amount of efforts towards all its initiatives. The organization is in the need of incorporating a model that promote a stable and prosperous business, supply chain and community.

Conclusion and Recommendation

This report reviewed existing studies and sought support for this contention and the findings of the study imply that Woolworths has many initiatives in place to fulfil and perform its social duties and some of them have achieved the goal while some are in the need of more efforts and attention. However, one significant factor that needs to be considered is that even if positive CSR initiatives do not reflect on the profitability but they could be used as a tool to reduce the risk of damage to brand evaluation in the future.

It is believed that the findings of this study performs several significant implications for future studies.

The study particularly suggest that the social responsibility/ organization’s performance could be context specific. Consequently, the enhancement of a theoretical understanding as well as organizational implications could largely rely on the contextual factors that improve a healthy relationship between CR and organizational performance.

Organizational factors could play a significant role in relationship between social responsibility and organizational outcome.


1. Alvesson, M., & Sköldberg, K. (2017). Reflexive methodology: New vistas for qualitative research. Sage.
2. Boulouta, I., & Pitelis, C. N. (2014). Who needs CSR? The impact of corporate social responsibility on national competitiveness. Journal of business ethics, 119(3), 349-364.
3. Bresciani, S., & Ferraris, A. (2016). Innovation-receiving subsidiaries and dual embeddedness: impact on business performance. Baltic Journal of Management, 11(1), 108-130.
4. Cavaco, S., & Crifo, P. (2014). CSR and financial performance: complementarity between environmental, social and business behaviours. Applied Economics, 46(27), 3323-3338.
5. Devin, B., & Richards, C. (2018). Food waste, power, and corporate social responsibility in the Australian food supply chain. Journal of Business Ethics, 150(1), 199-210.
6. Eccles, R. G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.
7. Kiliç, M., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2015). The impact of ownership and board structure on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reporting in the Turkish banking industry. Corporate Governance, 15(3), 357-374.
8. Kolk, A. (2016). The social responsibility of international business: From ethics and the environment to CSR and sustainable development. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 23-34.
9. Lee, K. H., Herold, D. M., & Yu, A. L. (2016). Small and medium enterprises and corporate social responsibility practice: A Swedish perspective. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(2), 88-99.
10. Lewis, S. (2015). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Health promotion practice, 16(4), 473-475.
11. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. M. (2015). Second language research: Methodology and design. Routledge.
12. Pulker, C. E., Trapp, G. S. A., Scott, J. A., & Pollard, C. M. (2018). What are the position and power of supermarkets in the Australian food system, and the implications for public health? A systematic scoping review. Obesity Reviews, 19(2), 198-218.
13. Rangan, K., Chase, L., & Karim, S. (2015). The truth about CSR. Harvard Business Review, 93(1/2), 40-49.
14. Rhou, Y., Singal, M., & Koh, Y. (2016). CSR and financial performance: The role of CSR awareness in the restaurant industry. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 57, 30-39.
15. Richards, Z., Thomas, S. L., Randle, M., & Pettigrew, S. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility programs of Big Food Marketing in Australia: a content analysis of industry documents. Australian and New Zealand journal of public health, 39(6), 550-556.
16. Singal, M. (2014). The link between firm financial performance and investment in sustainability initiatives. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 55(1), 19-30.
17. Taghian, M., D’Souza, C., & Polonsky, M. (2015). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility, reputation and business performance. Social Responsibility Journal, 11(2), 340-363.
18. Tingchi Liu, M., Anthony Wong, I., Shi, G., Chu, R., & L. Brock, J. (2014). The impact of corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance and perceived brand quality on customer-based brand preference. Journal of Services Marketing, 28(3), 181-194.
19. Wang, Q., Dou, J., & Jia, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of corporate social responsibility and corporate financial performance: The moderating effect of contextual factors. Business & Society, 55(8), 1083-1121.
20. (2018). Retrieved from