
HI6006 Competitive Strategy Editing Service
Delivery in day(s): 4
1. Political Factors: They represent how changes in political scenario and the upheavals on a global scale force the organization to undergo changes in terms of policies, regulation and economic framework.
2. Economic Factors:They lead to organizational change by putting forward growing uncertainties and competitive pressures.
3. Technological Factors: This involves technological innovations and advancements helped in revolutionizing the organizational function by adopting new means of working
The internal forces leading to the organizational change includes the presence of the systematic forces, inadequacy of the existing administrative process, individual speculations and structural and technological changes (Chrisman et al. 2013). It also includes the competencies of the employees, the issues with profitability and the limitation of resources.
There are organizations that either fine tunes or undergoes reorientation as anticipatory measures for facing environmental pressures (Cummings and Worley 2014). However, fine tuning represents implementations of the incremental changes that focus on the individual components that have a goal of regaining or maintaining congruence.
Changes that takes place in reaction to a specific or change of events is known as the reactive change. This change takes place when there is an increase or decrease in demand of the services or the products of the company. It is also a response to the crisis or the problematic situation that the organization faces.
Reorientation involves change in the organization from its existing state to the futuristic desired state that acts as anticipatory measure before taking into consideration the entire transition process.
Recreation also refers to the reactive change involving the entire organization. This takes place during a stage when the organization undergoes a serious crisis( Dionysiou and Tsoukas 2013).
Adaptation represents the most successful change since it is an incremental change in response to the external events. For instance, external events like the newer technology and action of the competitors requires a response in the form of an organizational change.
The problem with the choice of the change agent lay in choosing the appropriate person who can finally initiate the change (Carnall 2018). The choice of the agent should be such that he/she possesses the capability of working through any obstacles.
In determining the quality of change relationship the problem lay in the navigation of politics. It is very important to act as a manipulative dealmaker and the effective approach towards politics should lie somewhere between exploitation and ignorance. The challenge lies in choosing the power of leveraging without causing damage to relationships.
The problems faced in the specification of change issues include challenges in bringing a new leader in the helm of employee resistance, undertake proper communication regarding a change, establishing a new system based on the client or customer complaint and bringing about a swift change without proper intimation to staffs.
Users who doesn’t have interest in learning new technology
Users who claims of not having much time
Users who are happy with existing platforms
2. Have you experienced both Active and Passive forms?
Yes, they were present in both active and passive forms
3. Have you experienced them as a Resistor yourself (as a recipient of change)?
No
4. Have you experienced them as someone responsible for the Management of Change (as an initiator of change)?
Yes
5. Things that could be done differently
These include (Buckingham and Coffman 2014):
By applying effective management to a project from the beginning
Expecting the resistance to the change and implementing suitable measures
Consider managing the resistance to change as a sole reactive tactic for the practitioners of change management.
Identification of the root causes of resistance
Engaging the right kind of resistance manager
While shaping the change strategy, the organization failed to estimate the type and the amount of resistance. It also failed to determine the position of initiators against the resistors based on the trust and power. The organization also failed to determine the relevant date for designing change and the required energy for its implementation. The organization also failed to consider the amount of stake involved that includes determining both the presence and the lack of presence related to crisis and the consequences of the resistance.
The thing that has really impacted my thought process is that managing change is difficult. This is because; it involves tackling various priorities simultaneously and involves little agreement. Time is also a key factor in determining transformation initiative.
2.How will it/does it inform your practice as an evidence-based practitioner?
As evidence based practitioner it helps informing the practice by finding evidence or information in answering the question and in critically appraising the evidence and information.
3. Topics presented in the unit that resonates best with you.
Topic 5 that deals with people and culture resonates best with me.
Implications for Acting in Future
As a change manager I would like to focus on the people side of the change in future that included the changes to the business processes, technology and systems, organizational structures and job roles.
4. Idea to Managing Organizational Change, what would be your Contribution?
Building coalitions of change that creates an appeal to the self interest of the people. As a practicing change manager, I will try to maintain the quality of the overall process of change management (Hornstein 2015).
5. Actions Necessary for Successful Change Management Process and Ratings Provided
This includes:
Communication and Communication planning; Rating- Very Poor
Development of training and delivery; Rating- Poor
Management of Resistance; Rating – Very Poor
Corrective Action and Employee Feedback- Poor
Steps taken for developing capacity in this regard are as follows:
By documenting the current change
By reviewing the current metrics:
Watching out for the trending request, incident and problems
By forming a capacity management community of practice